<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;As Reported&#8221;, a 4IP pitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rattlecentral.com/blog/2009/02/as-reported-a-4ip-pitch/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rattlecentral.com/blog/2009/02/as-reported-a-4ip-pitch</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stef</title>
		<link>http://www.rattlecentral.com/blog/2009/02/as-reported-a-4ip-pitch/comment-page-1#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Stef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rattlecentral.com/?p=50#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Hi - nice idea. Similar to something I pitched them, and I&#039;ve also been putting my ideas up on my blog, most of which didn&#039;t get past the initial &#039;what do you think?&#039;

Maybe you could email me and I&#039;ll send over the pitch - who knows, we could improve on it together...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; nice idea. Similar to something I pitched them, and I&#8217;ve also been putting my ideas up on my blog, most of which didn&#8217;t get past the initial &#8216;what do you think?&#8217;</p>
<p>Maybe you could email me and I&#8217;ll send over the pitch &#8211; who knows, we could improve on it together&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Boardwell</title>
		<link>http://www.rattlecentral.com/blog/2009/02/as-reported-a-4ip-pitch/comment-page-1#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>James Boardwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rattlecentral.com/?p=50#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Tom.
For 5k all we could hope to do was prototype the idea.  This could never have been a production ready thing on that budget.
Who checks the checkers?  It would be a nice problem to have. Wikipedia manages this in two ways: 1. through the community the edit; 2. through &#039;editors&#039; that look to the changes and moderate particularly sensitive topics.
Again, all this was essentially to thought through in creating the prototype.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Tom.<br />
For 5k all we could hope to do was prototype the idea.  This could never have been a production ready thing on that budget.<br />
Who checks the checkers?  It would be a nice problem to have. Wikipedia manages this in two ways: 1. through the community the edit; 2. through &#8216;editors&#8217; that look to the changes and moderate particularly sensitive topics.<br />
Again, all this was essentially to thought through in creating the prototype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Loosemore</title>
		<link>http://www.rattlecentral.com/blog/2009/02/as-reported-a-4ip-pitch/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Loosemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 15:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rattlecentral.com/?p=50#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Tis a great idea.
But...
&quot;Greasemonkey script or Firefox plugin&quot;
That&#039;s why you didn&#039;t win.
Hard to see how anyone other than the owners of large sites could execute it properly - and they&#039;d either not want to do it, or want to Do It Themselves for good reasons (CMS integration) or bad (they&#039;re the BBC).
Someone, however, will eventually Find A Way. Do something with Journalisted.com ?
Plus there&#039;s the question who&#039;d check to see if the sources suggested are valid? Who checks the checkers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tis a great idea.<br />
But&#8230;<br />
&#8220;Greasemonkey script or Firefox plugin&#8221;<br />
That&#8217;s why you didn&#8217;t win.<br />
Hard to see how anyone other than the owners of large sites could execute it properly &#8211; and they&#8217;d either not want to do it, or want to Do It Themselves for good reasons (CMS integration) or bad (they&#8217;re the BBC).<br />
Someone, however, will eventually Find A Way. Do something with Journalisted.com ?<br />
Plus there&#8217;s the question who&#8217;d check to see if the sources suggested are valid? Who checks the checkers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
